52 replies to this topic

[RootsThatRuin]

Sorry Naraa *looks ashamedly down*. blame kennie though!

[DeAgon]

i apologise whole heartedly

[♥i-love-you♥]

You should be proud it took so long to go off topic. That's quite an achievement for this forum.

[DeAgon]

yeah, i know but im so reticent *blushes*

[Naraa]

Kennie you twat! Kidding, and whatever this time. However you know you wouldn't like to be warned over such things (includes Sean lol, even though that probably would make no sense), I wouldn't like to be the one passing warnings either, but someday we'll have to start respecting these rules more, or else we won't be able to warn newbies for anything either, they'll just walk on us and piss all over us because we simply ignore the rules you know.

Just noting, whenever this place is new again, I'm sure we'll have to be harder on the rules.

Oh, and I'm sorry for spending too much time doing nothing about this layout. Shouldn't take too long, however I'm having some personal difficulties right now so it's hard to focus.

I'm not the only lazy person right now though. You're all lazy, for not reading my threads or making any suggestions.

(I just realized how boring I am nowadays. damn)

[Britty-kitty]

What exactly do you mean by being harsher on the rules? I'd rather not go back to being scared of saying something because we could get warned or banned for it.

I do believe however we need to go back to 60% being banned for a few days, I think 40% as well you were banned for 24 hours and then once you hit 100% you get banned for a month. And serious warnings, not the silly one's we sometimes do.

Don't worry, my time of fun these days is just eating ice cream or going to starbucks.

[♥i-love-you♥]

No worries Naraa, it is the end of the year after all, so we all have limited time available.

[Naraa]

Britty-kitty, on Dec 18 2011, 07:25 PM, said:

Don't worry, my time of fun these days is just eating ice cream or going to starbucks.

If I could go to starbucks, my life would've been complete.

Britty-kitty, on Dec 18 2011, 07:25 PM, said:

I do believe however we need to go back to 60% being banned for a few days, I think 40% as well you were banned for 24 hours and then once you hit 100% you get banned for a month. And serious warnings, not the silly one's we sometimes do.

Yeah agreed.

Britty-kitty, on Dec 18 2011, 07:25 PM, said:

What exactly do you mean by being harsher on the rules? I'd rather not go back to being scared of saying something because we could get warned or banned for it.

People are actually very respectful around here. However we usually look past most of the inappropriate behaviour (i can't remember the last time i saw inappropriate behaviour though).

Warnings though exsist so members know when they are being too harsh, or when they break the rules. If we run around with rules and if the mods don't give a shit about them themselves, there's no reason for rules. And when everyone is going Off-topic, because they don't think too much out of it, the forum will be a mess. People will have issues posting because they don't feel anything is relevant to what they have to say, and they'll rather end up lurking instead. But lurkers don't really give us much of what we want, do they? nop.

Anyway, I don't mean we're gonna start warning everyone for the simplest things. I probably wouldn't warn anyone for going off-topic, because I know how easy that is and sometimes relevance is hidden within some of it. I'd rather just remind them of the rules and let them stray off to the chat or something. But whenever in the future we get moderators who are even more dedicated to the rules than us, they will have issues with the members and it'll turn into a riot here because nobody approves of that behaviour. However it's not wrong, Lady and Effy was Satan's minions compared to us. And they handled it the right way, even though they got shit from the members.

I just don't want the warning system to be forgotten, like it's about to.

[RootsThatRuin]

Some ideas for the forum: I wonder if there's any way to stimulate the music section. That used to be what I came here for, to talk to people about music that nobody at my school likes. Now its just me and Joey having random conversations and the occasional noob putting My Chemical Romance in the emo section
As for the theme, I think it should be simple, but interesting. Something sleek, but not too much. If I could design one, I would, but I'm not good with graphic design. It also has to be gender neutral, as stated by somebody else, if there will be no option. I wonder if we could design the center part of the page where the content goes so that it stays the same color, but have the right, left, and top portions be able to change. The html would have to incorporate a table with two rows and three collumns, the bottom center cell of which would need to have an absolute background color that doesn't change with theme selection, and the top right, top center, top left, bottom left, and bottom right would change with theme selection. The purpose of this would be too keep the part where the content goes the same for everybody, but people can still choose their own background theme. Does this make any sense? And is it possible?

[RootsThatRuin]

Reported...

[sarena]

Where THE FUCK did everyone go?

[♥i-love-you♥]

sarena, on 27 May 2012 - 03:19 AM, said:

Where THE FUCK did everyone go?

Where did YOU go?

[sarena]

I'm right here!